Middle Nikaya Majjhima Nikaya

103. Economic Thinking like? (Kinti Sutta).

---

Thus have I heard.
A residence time in Kusinara Bhagavan, at Baliharana forests. Here, Bhagavan called the monks: "Hey Monks" - "Yes, venerable sir." The monks did Bhagavan replied yes. Bhagavan says as follows:
- Hey monks, for me, of how he thinks? Is it because people robe, sermon recluse Gotama? Or is it because the food's alms, recluse Gotama preach? Or is it because people couch, recluse Gotama preach? Or is it because of their success or failure, recluse Gotama preach?
- Ladies not, venerable sir! They do not think: "Since human robes, preaching recluse Gotama. Or because alms food workers, recluse Gotama sermon. Or for people couch, recluse Gotama sermon. Or for people success or failure, recluse Gotama preach ".
- And so, the monks, for me, for He does not think like this: "Since human robes, recluse Gotama's sermon ... because the success or failure, recluse Gotama preach" . This so Monks, for me, the thought of how he? "
- Like this, venerable sir, to Bhagavan, we think as follows: "With the heart, for the benefit of others and by compassion, Bhagavan sermon".
- Thus, the monks, for me, the think as follows: "With compassion, for the benefit of others and by compassion, Bhagavan sermon".
Therefore, the monks, those I spoke to the place he with terrace, as four foundations of mindfulness, four primary needs, such as the sufficiency Four, Five apartments, Five forces, Seven Bodhi part, Noble eight branches . Here, he had to learn it all, in a spirit of harmony, joy, not quarrel with each other. And the monks, when he was studying in the law, in the spirit of harmony, joy, not quarrel with each other, there may be two different monks saying the win Justice (Abhidhamma).
Here, if you think like this: "Between the venerable position, there is the difference in meaning, the cultural differences"; here, the monks do you think is easier said than acquiescent, come he says as follows: "Between the venerable differences in meaning, with the difference in writing. On this issue the Sun he must know the difference in meaning, with the difference in text like this. The venerable shalt have no quarrel with one another ". Then a sect monks of the other party that you think is easier said than acquiescent, visit and he said the following: "Between the venerable differences in meaning, the cultural differences. About this issue, the Venerable to know the difference in meaning, the cultural differences like this. The venerable shalt have no quarrel with one another ". Thus, something hard to hold, should maintain life is difficult to hold. After life over is difficult to hold something hard to hold, what belongs to France, what belongs to the law must be spoken.
Here, if he thought as follows: "Between the venerable ranks, there is the difference in meaning, there is uniformity in the documents". Here, the monks do you think is easier said than acquiescent, come and say he is as follows. "Between the venerable, no difference in meaning, there is uniformity in the text. In this regard, the Venerable to know the difference in meaning, there is uniformity in the office like this. The Venerable Let no quarrel with one another ". Then the monks of the other side that you think is easier said than acquiescent, visit and he said the following: "Between the venerable differences in meaning, there is uniformity in the documents. About this issue, the Venerable to know the difference in meaning, there is uniformity in the office like this. The venerable shalt have no quarrel with one another ". Thus, something hard to hold, should maintain life is difficult to hold, something easy to hold to maintain life is easy to hold. After life over is difficult to hold something hard to hold, after life over what is easy to hold easy to hold, what belongs to France, what belongs to the Law must be spoken.
Here, if you think like this: "Between this venerable, a uniformity of meaning, the cultural differences." Here, the monks do you think is easier said than acquiescent, visit and he said the following: "Between the Venerable, a uniformity that, with the difference in writing. On this issue, the venerable must know there is an identity of meaning, with the difference in text like this. But this is only a minor problem that is cultural: The venerable shalt have no quarrel with each other because of a minor problem ". Then the monks of the other side that you think is easier said than acquiescent, think about what you did and said as follows: "Between the Venerable, a uniformity of meaning, the cultural differences . In this regard, the Venerable must know there is uniformity in the definition, there is the difference in text like this. But this is only a minor problem, ie the text. The venerable shalt have no quarrel with together, as a minor problem "So, something easy to hold, easy to maintain life is maintained, something hard to hold, to maintain life is difficult to hold. After the easy life over holding something easy to hold, after life over is hard to hold something hard to hold, what belongs to France, what belongs to the Law must be spoken.
Here, if you think like this: "Between the venerable This means there is consensus about the cultural identity"; here, the monks do you think is easier said than acquiescent, visit and he said the following: "Among the most venerable consent of meaning and also of cultural identity. On the issue This, the venerable must know there is an identity of meaning and also consensus documents like this. The venerable Let no quarreling among themselves ". Then the monks of the other side that you think is easier said than acquiescent, visit and he said the following: "Between the Venerable, a uniformity of meaning and cultural uniformity. In this regard, the Venerable must know that there is consensus and there is also consensus documents like this. The venerable shalt have no quarrel with one another ". Thus, something easy to hold to maintain life is easy to hold. After the easy life over holding something easy to hold, what belongs to France, what belongs to the Law Please be spoken ".
And the monks, when he was studying law in a spirit of harmony, joy, not quarrel with each other, there may be other monks transgression, offense.
Here, monks, do not be hasty censure individuals other people need to sense observation. The He must think: "There will not be any harm to us, and there will be no harm to the other person. If the person does not outrage, not resentment, which is agile, and easily convinced, and I can raise him beyond immoral, dwell on the good ". Monks Hey, if you think so, the time is right and he should say.
But if, the monks, and he thought as follows: "There will not be any harm to us, and there will be damage to the other person. The man with anger, resentment, it is slow, but easy theory Apparel, and we can raise him beyond immoral, dwell on the good. But this is only a minor problem, ie damage to the other person. And this is the greater, as we have This can lead people beyond immoral, dwell on the good ". Monks Hey, if you think so, the time is right and he should say.
But the monks, if he thought as follows: "It is bad for us and no harm to the other person. The man has no anger, resentment, there is sparkling, but hardly convincing , and we can raise him beyond immoral, to dwell on the good. But this is only a minor problem, ie the damage for us. And this is the greater, is that we can make This person is beyond immoral, dwell on the good ". Monks Hey, if he thought so, he should say the time is right.
But the monks, if he thought as follows: "It is bad for us and would have hurt the other person. Others anger, resentment, it is slow, difficult and we have to convince This can lead people beyond immoral, dwell on the good. But this is only a minor problem, that is bad for us and harm to other people. And this is the greater, is that we can make This person is beyond immoral, dwell on the good ". Monks Hey, if he thought so, he should say the time is right.
But the monks, if he thought as follows: "I will be harmed and damaged the other also. The other outrage, resentment, it is slow, difficult to convince, and we do not have This can lead people beyond immoral, dwell on the good ". For such a person, the monks, be social, do not have to despise.
And the monks, when he was studying law in a spirit of harmony, joy, not quarrel with each other, which may arise between him, a gate operator, a perverse idea, one heart hostility and hatred cerebral superiority, indignation. Here, the monks of the other side that you think is easier said than acquiescent, go to he and say: "Hey Sage, though we did learn the law of ecumenism , joy, no quarreling among themselves, there arises a border issue, a perverse idea, a hateful hostility center, giving the brain, disgusted. If you know how, monks would rebuke ". Answering a right feet, the monks, monks have responded as follows: "Hey Sage, for oil, we learn that in the spirit of the law sociable, happy, no quarreling among themselves ..., monks would rebuke. "
But the sage, if not renounce conditions, Nirvana can be attained reasonable? "If the answer right feet, the monks, monks have responded as follows:" Hey Sage If not renounce conditions, Nirvana can not witness it. "
Then the monks of the other side that you think is easier said than acquiescent he come and say: "Hey Sage, though we did learn the law ..., Monks will rebuke ". Answering a right feet, the monks, monks have responded as follows: "Hey Sage, oil for us ..., monks would rebuke."
But the sage, if not renounce conditions, Nirvana can be attained reasonable? "If the answer right feet, the monks, monks have responded as follows:" Hey Sage If not renounce conditions, Nirvana can not witness it. "
But the monks, if the other he was asked Monks, said: "The monks had been made venerable beyond immoral, to dwell on the good reasonable?" If the answer right feet, the monks, monks have responded as follows: "Here, the sage, I went to Bhagavan and Bhagavan His sermon for me. After hearing the legal then, I've spoken to his monks. When monks had heard her approach finished, he breaks free from the evil and on the good to dwell. " Replies thus the monks, monks not pat himself belittle people. He explained the legal right to legal option, and no one in the French say depending organic theory, could lead to libel.
Bhagavan such preaching. Monks credit joyful life teaching the word Bhagavan.END=NAM MO SAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGTHMENT.WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.3/10/2015.