(Kintisutta)

Thus have I heard.

A residence time in Kusinara Exalted, in forests Baliharana. Here, Bhagavan called Monks: "Hey Monks" - "Ladies and yes, white Exalted." Monks did Bhagavan replied yes. Bhagavan says as follows:

- Hey Monks, for me, of how you think? Is it because people robes, recluse Gotama sermon? Or is it because the food's alms, recluse Gotama sermon? Or is it because the person is ready, recluse Gotama sermon? Or is it because the success or failure personnel, recluse Gotama sermon?

- Ladies and not, transparent Exalted!

We do not think: "Because people robes, recluse Gotama sermon ... (as above) ... For people success or failure, recluse Gotama sermon".

- And so, the Monks, for me, for He does not think like this: "So's robes, recluse Gotama sermon ... (as above) ... For people success or failure, Sa Gotama jelly sermon ". This Monks So, for me, the thought of how he? "

- Like this, transparency Exalted, to Bhagavan, we think as follows: "With the heart, for the forgiveness and compassion by Bhagavan sermon".

- Thus, the Monks, for me, do you think the following: "With the heart, for the forgiveness and compassion by Bhagavan sermon".

Therefore, the Monks, the method I explained to the upper position he with, as four foundations of mindfulness, four primary needs, such as the sufficiency Four, Five apartments, Five forces, Seven Bodhi part, Noble eight branches . Here, you have to learn it all, in a spirit of harmony, joy, do not quarrel with each other. And the Monks, when he was studying in the law, in the spirit of harmony, joy, do not quarrel with each other, there may be two different Monks say the Abhidhamma (Win law). Here, if you think like this: "Between the venerable position, there is a difference in meaning, the cultural differences"; here, the Monks do you think is easier said than upon demand, be sure to say he is as follows: "Between the venerable differences in meaning of cultural differences. In this regard he came to know the differences in meaning of cultural differences like this. The venerable shall have no quarrel with each other. " Then a bhikkhu of the other schools that you think is easier said than upon need, please come and he said the following: "Between the venerable differences in meaning of cultural differences. In this regard, he came to know the differences in meaning of cultural differences like this. The venerable shall have no quarrel with each other. " So, what's hard to hold, it is hard to maintain life holds. After maintain life is difficult to hold something hard to hold, what belongs to the law, under what law should be told. Here, if he thought as follows: "Between the venerable level, there is a difference in meaning, there is consensus document". Here, the Monks do you think is easier said than upon need, please come and he said the following. "Between the venerable, differences in meaning, there is consensus document. In this regard, he came to know the differences in meaning, there is uniformity in the text like this. The venerable shall have no quarrel with each other. "

Then a bhikkhu of the other side that you think is easier said than upon need, please come and he said the following: "Between the venerable differences in meaning, there is consensus document. In this regard, he came to know the differences in meaning, there is uniformity in the text like this. The venerable shall have no quarrel with each other. " So, what's hard to hold, it is hard to maintain life holds, something easy to hold to maintain life is easy to hold. After maintain life is difficult to hold something hard to hold, is easy to maintain life after holding something easy to hold, what belongs to the law, under what law should be told. Here, if you think like this: "Between the venerable, there is consensus that, with the cultural differences." Here, the Monks do you think is easier said than upon need, please come and he said the following: "Between the Venerable, which means unity, differences in text. In this regard, he came to know the unity of meaning, there is a difference in text like this. But this is only a minor problem that is cultural: The venerable shall have no quarrel with each other because of a minor problem. " Then a bhikkhu of the other side that you think is easier said than upon need, think about what you did and said as follows: "Between the venerable, there is uniformity in the definition, the cultural differences . In this regard, he came to know the unity of meaning, there is a difference in text like this. But this is only a minor problem, ie documents. The venerable shall have no quarrel with each other, because a small problem. "So, what is easy to hold, easy to maintain life was held, something hard to hold, it is difficult to maintain life holds. After maintain life is easy to hold something easy to hold, after life over is hard to hold something hard to hold, what belongs to the law, under what law should be told. Here, if you think like this: "Between this venerable consensus that there is uniformity in the office"; here, the monks do you think is easier said than upon need, come and he said the following: "Among the most venerable consent of meaning and also the cultural uniformity. In this regard, he came to know the unity of meaning and also the consistency of such documents. The venerable shall have no quarreling among themselves. " Then a bhikkhu of the other side that you think is easier said than upon need, please come and he said the following: "Between the Venerable, which means uniformity and homogeneity of the text. In this regard, he came to know the unity of meaning and also the consistency of such documents. The venerable shall have no quarrel with each other. " Thus, something easy to hold to maintain life is easy to hold. After maintain life is easy to hold something easy to hold, for what are legal, what belongs to the law please speak up. "

And the Monks, when he was studying law in the spirit of harmony, joy, do not quarrel with each other, there may be other Monks transgression, breaking the law. Here, the Monks, do not be hasty rebuke, other individuals who have visual observation. (The He must be thinking): "There is no harm for us, and there will be no harm to the other person. If the other person does not outrage, not resentment, there is mercurial, and easily persuaded, and we can make him beyond evil, to dwell on the good. " This Monks, if you think so, he should say the time is right. But if, the Monks, and he thought as follows: "There is no harm to me, and would have hurt the other person. The other indignation, resentment, which is slow, but easy to convince, and we can make him beyond evil, to dwell on the good. But this is only a minor problem, ie the damage to the other person. And this is the greater, as we can make it beyond the evil, to dwell on the good. " This Monks, if you think so, he should say the time is right. But the Monks, if he thought as follows: "It is bad for us and no harm to the other person. The man has no indignation, resentment, there is mercurial, but hardly convincing, and it is possible that he is beyond evil, to dwell on the good. But this is only a minor problem, ie the damage to us. And this is the greater, as we can make it beyond the evil, to dwell on the good. " This Monks, if he thought so, he should say the time is right. But the Monks, if he thought as follows: "It is bad for us and would have hurt the other person. Others indignation, resentment, which is slow, difficult and we can convince people that this is beyond evil, to dwell on the good. But this is only a minor problem, which is bad for us and harm to the other person. And this is the greater, as we can make it beyond the evil, to dwell on the good. " This Monks, if he thought so, he should say the time is right. But the Monks, if he thought as follows: "I will be harmed and the other is harmed. The other indignation, resentment, which is slow, difficult to convince, and we can not make it beyond the evil, to dwell on the good. " For such a person, the Monks, flush, do not be so despised.

And the Monks, when he was studying law in the spirit of harmony, joy, do not quarrel with each other, may arise between him, a border issue, a perverse opinion, a center hostility and hatred mental afflictions, indignantly. Here, a bhikkhu of the other side that you think is easier said than upon need, come and he said the following: "Hey Sage, though we learn that the method of ecumenism , joy, no quarreling among themselves, there arises a border issue, a perverse idea, an unforgiving hatred heart, brain strengths, indignantly. If you know how, Monks will rebuke ". Answering a right feet, the Monks, Monks have answered as follows: "Hey Sage, oil, we learn that in the spirit of the law sociable, happy, no quarreling among themselves ... (as above) ... Monks will rebuke. But the sage, if not waive such conditions, Nirvana may be reasonable evidence? "If the answer right feet, the Monks, Monks have answered as follows:" Hey Sage If not waive such conditions, Nirvana can not be certified. " Then a bhikkhu of the other side that you think is easier said than upon demand he come and say as follows: "Hey Sage, though we learn that the law ... (as above). .. Monks will rebuke ". Answering a right feet, the Monks, Monks have answered as follows: "Hey Sage, oil for us ... (as above) ... Salmone will rebuke. But the sage, if not waive such conditions, Nirvana may be reasonable evidence? "If the answer right feet, the Monks, Monks have answered as follows:" Hey Sage If not waive such conditions, Nirvana can not be certified. "

But the Monks, if the other Mr Monks asked him, saying: "The monks had been made venerable beyond evil, to dwell on the good reasonable?" If the answer feet district, the Monks, Monks have answered as follows: "Here, the Sage, I went to Bhagavan and Bhagavan His sermon for me. After hearing that law, I said back to him Monks. Monks When he heard he finished law, he breaks free from the evil and on the good to dwell. " Reply to this, the Monks, Monks do not blame people praising her. He explained the legal right to legal custom, and no one in the French say, depending organic theory, could lead to defamation.

Exalted such discourses. Monks happy life signal word Bhagavan taught.END=VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTMENT.WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=THE EIGHTFOLD PATH.AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.24/1/2015.